#Betty boop logo professional

Ninth Circuit: Trademark Law Does Not Reach Unauthorized Sale of Character/Logo Products Where the Allure of the Product is the Character/Logo The District Court dismissed both claims, holding that the family failed to prove at least one of the links in the chain of each of the possible alleged chains of ownership, and that the family therefore could not prove it owned the copyrights or trademark rights. Having done that (or so they thought), the family then sued the defendants, who sell BETTY BOOP handbags and t-shirts without authorization, for copyright and trademark infringement.

The creator’s family (the plaintiff) started a business to try to purchase back the rights from all of these companies. Several decades and many transfers later, the rights were divided among several companies.

The creator transferred all his copyrights in the character in 1941 to a second company. The case was filed by the family of the creator of the 1930s cartoon character BETTY BOOP. Significantly, the Ninth Circuit ruled that because BETTY BOOP “was a prominent feature” of the defendants’ t-shirts and handbags “so as to be visible to others when worn,” it was unprotectable under trademark law. 23, 2011), the Ninth Circuit-whose rulings are binding on federal courts in California, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, and Hawaii-threw out claims asserted by the alleged owners of the copyrights and trademarks in the image of the famous mid-20th century cartoon icon, BETTY BOOP.

#Betty boop logo professional

Licensing programs for professional and college sports logos, and other character licensing programs have been put at risk by a recent decision of the U.S.